If the two team captains agree to eliminate the halftime interval but one player insists on a halftime break, what should the referee do?

In a situation where the two team captains have mutually agreed to eliminate the halftime interval, the referee is bound by the agreement reached between the captains. If one player insists on a halftime break after the captains have agreed to forgo it, the referee must uphold the decision made by the captains. Allowing for a halftime break would contradict the agreement that has already been established, which is key to maintaining the spirit of cooperation and fair play among the teams.

Therefore, the correct course of action in this scenario is to not grant a halftime interval, because doing so would disregard the formal agreement between the captains. Instead, the referee should inform both captains that the game will proceed without a break, effectively reiterating the terms that were mutually accepted. This maintains the integrity of the match and ensures that decisions made during the game reflect the collaborative spirit that is vital in sports officiating.