Which of the following instances is NOT an example of allowance made for lost time?

The correct answer is that the first option represents a situation that does not warrant an allowance for lost time. In soccer, the game is played within a set duration, and the clock continues to run even when the ball goes out of play due to normal circumstances, such as a throw-in or a goal kick. These routine stoppages are expected parts of the game and do not require additional time to be added on at the end of regulation time.

In contrast, instances where a player is injured, substitutions occur, or natural delays due to weather conditions all result in significant interruptions to gameplay that necessitate the consideration of additional time. Referees account for these delays to ensure fairness and allow for the full experience of the match to be completed, which is why they identify them as circumstances that warrant an allowance for lost time.